Hi, On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:46:55PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote: > One of the point is that, pulling some packages to version > 3.2.1~rc1-2, it should have pulled all dependent packages to the same > version.
True. But the dependenies on the packages you have *are* correct. There's no reason -filter-mobiledev needs a newer -common etc. Also not for the RB (see below) > As I mentioned, I updated the other packages by hand but > IMHO, the dependencies should have taken care of that for me. For example? > break, that's why I sent a report). The dependency system should take > care that the right packages are updated. For example, > libreoffice-report-builder depends on libreoffice-core meaning that > any version of the latter will do. This is correct. libreoffice-report-builder is an extension and is supposed to work with *any* OOo/LibO. That there is no versioned dependency here is correct. (Well, it being unzipped in share/extensions needs a 3.3.x, but that is a given, given that there's no LibO before it) > If a constraint on the version is required, this should be mentioned. Correct. But the RB doesn't need a newer version. > The second point of the report is that, even after manually upgrading > all packages to their 3.2.1~rc1-2 version, libreoffice broke with the > given exception when trying to open a file. I will send you my former > .libreoffice directory privately. MMh, OK. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
