On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not > be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will > read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay > their upload.
Not a strong reason, but something to consider: The only package I know which did depend on qssl in the past was psi. At the moment, qssl could simply be removed, and if nobody speaks up in the next few weeks, I'll probably ask the ftp masters to do so. Jan
