severity 597962 important
kthxbye

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 20:10:43 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:

> I suspect the ability to reproduce the issue depends somewhat on the
> pattern of other memory allocations going on etc since that will effect
> how quickly the erroneously freed memory gets reused (if at all), which
> might explain away the small number of people who are seeing this. I
> tried (reasonably hard) to construct a smaller test case which exhibited
> the problem but I was unable to do so.
> 
Seems to fit the bill for important: "a bug which has a major effect on
the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to
everyone."

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to