Hi there! On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:56:14 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Joshua Timberman <jos...@opscode.com> wrote: > > We (Opscode, upstream maintainers of Chef) are fine with removal > > of the following chef packages from Debian Squeeze:
I would have preferred to be cc:ed by Joshua in his first reply, given that I work on chef/solr bugs during the Bern BSP <http://wiki.debian.org/BSP2010/Bern> and I guess Joshua's acknowledgement of removal is because of: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602697#35 http://bugs.debian.org/605277 > > chef-server > > chef-server-api > > chef-server-webui > > chef-solr > > > > The client packages should remain, and should be updated to the > > latest release (0.9.12): > > > > chef > > libchef-ruby > > libchef-ruby1.8 > > > > These can't be updated to the latest release because of the freeze. > Are you fine with removing the chef-* binary packages from the source > package and keep the same upstream version? or should I add a removal > hint from Squeeze for src:chef? Already there: http://bugs.debian.org/605277 Please note that if chef-solr is being removed from squeeze, the reverse dependency that impeded solr removal goes away as well: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602697#10 > > I do have updated packaging in the Debian Ruby Extras team repository > > for these packages. > > > > Where can I find the packaging? (where is the repository?) I guess http://wiki.opscode.com/display/chef/Package+Installation+on+Debian+and+Ubuntu Mehdi, is it OK if I stop to care about this bug and leave it to you? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
