On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Simon Law wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:03:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > wvstreams is implemented in C++. Where are the package renames for the > > C++ ABI transition?
> > Simon, is it really true that none of the wvstreams libraries use code > > from libstdc++? (None of the packages have dependencies on libstdc++5) > > I guess this is possible, but at least one of the library packages has > > undefined symbols, which makes it unsuitable for use by any sort of DSO > > plugin: > WvStreams does not use code from libstdc++, which we carefully avoid > compiling in, by linking with gcc (not g++). Hrm. That seems of dubious benefit to me. > Why ldd thinks we do is slightly beyond me. ldd traverses library dependencies; it's merely reporting the fact that libxplc.so.0.3.11-unstable depends on libstdc++ (which is one reason why I think using gcc for linking is of dubious benefit). > As for WvHashTableBase, this is probably some place where an > interlibrary dependency has snuck in somehow. I don't see it in my > build of WvStreams 5, so I'm not going to get too stressed out about it. Ok, that's fine. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
