On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:11:25PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Sep-09 17:01, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > just wanted to note that the changes to the build depends are possibly
> > not intended:
> > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), postgresql-dev, python-dev, 
> > python2.1-dev, python2.2-dev, python2.3-dev
> > +Build-Depends: debhelper, postgresql-dev, libssl-dev, python-dev, 
> > python2.1-dev, python2.2-dev, python2.3-dev
> > 
> > The package uses DH_COMPAT = 3, so the (>> 3.0.0) version is needed,
> > at least it does no harm to be left in there.

> Even woody has debhelper >> 4, so I think it makes sense to remove the
> version requirement, but of course it does not do any harm to keep it.

> > And adding libssl-dev will violate the GPL copyright. No GPL software is
> > allowed to link against SSL (at least not without exception clause).
> > Instead I would add:
> > Build-Conflicts: libssl-dev

> Please note that the package FTBFS without 'libssl-dev' installed 
> with an error message like "openssl/ssl.h: No such file or directory".

This is because libpq-dev #includes <openssl/ssl.h> if USE_SSL is
defined.  python-popy probably needs to unset this before including
libpq-fe.h.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to