On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:12:28PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 17:00, Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
>
> > Alvaro confirmed GPL:
>
> If he is OK with both 2 & 3, can you ask him if GPL 2+ is OK, as well?
Alvaro,
thanks for your previous mail on the matter of the license of your
of your SHA-1 SSE2/MMX implementation.
You said you were fine with either GPLv2 or GPLv3. Aircrack-ng is
licensed under the GPLv2 with an additional exception for linking
against OpenSSL:
| In addition, as a special exception, the copyright holders give
| permission to link the code of portions of this program with the
| OpenSSL library under certain conditions as described in each
| individual source file, and distribute linked combinations
| including the two.
| You must obey the GNU General Public License in all respects for all of
| the code used other than OpenSSL.
| * If you modify file(s) with this exception, you may extend this
| exception to your version of the file(s), but you are not obligated to
| do so.
| * If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your
| version.
| * If you delete this exception statement from all source files in the
| program, then also delete it here.
Can you give us a quick reconfirmation that GPLv2 plus the exception
above can be taken as the license for your code?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
