Le vendredi 29 oct. 2010 à 15:02:37 (+0200), Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:45:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote: > > > tags 385760 + pending > > thanks > > > > Le jeudi 28 oct. 2010 à 00:55:18 (+0200), Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > > in the default configuration of dspam, if daemon gets enabled, the > > > daemon wants to listen on tcp port 24. Starting dspam per default as > > > user dspam then will just not work. Linux prevents direct “reserved > > > port” assignments by any process other than system root. > > > > > > So you either let it run by root or fix the default port for this > > > application. > > > > > > Interim-Solution: fix the init-script to blow up if user tries this. > > > > This is already fixed in git. The default port is now 1024. > > > 1024 really doesn't sound like a good idea either, imo, there's every > chance somebody else will choose the first non-privileged port for some > other use.
I can easily change this, what do you suggest? I also thought at 2424, what do you think? Cheers, Julien -- Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> http://www.kirya.net GPG key: 1024D/9F71D449 17F4 93D8 746F F011 B845 9F91 210B F2AB 9F71 D449
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
