Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 22:31 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > On Oct 27, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > > > in 164-1, libgudev was moved from /usr/lib to /lib, but it depends on > > libraries from /usr/lib: > > > > # ldd /lib/libgudev-1.0.so.0.0.1 | grep usr > > libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xb7822000) > > libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0xb781c000) > > > > Unless there are packages which require libgudev in /lib, we should move > > them back to > > /usr/lib or coordinate with glib2.0 first, to move the affected libs to > > /lib first. > > Good point. Any comments from the glib2.0 side? > I believe that other distributions ship glib in /lib, what are our > plans? Post-squeeze at this point, I suppose.
libglib is already in /lib, but currently libgobject and libgthread are not. Apparently libgpod-common is using libgobject too, in a binary run from udev rules. So that makes another reason for moving libgobject to /lib - maybe even in squeeze, if this is considered RC. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
