Your message dated Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:54:52 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327059: arb: FTBFS (amd64): relocation R_X86_64_32 against
`a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with
-fPIC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 11:14:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 07 04:14:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d020135.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.20.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECxt2-0000zE-00; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 04:14:40 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECxt0-0007WC-Ex; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:14:38 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: arb: FTBFS (amd64): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol'
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:14:38 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: arb
Version: 0.0.20050526-1
Severity: serious
When building 'arb' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error:
GLwDrawA.c:651: warning: unused parameter 'params'
GLwDrawA.c:651: warning: unused parameter 'numParams'
GLwDrawA.c:344: warning: missing initializer
GLwDrawA.c:344: warning: (near initialization for
'glwDrawingAreaClassRec.glwDrawingArea_class')
GLwDrawA.c: In function 'createColormap':
GLwDrawA.c:430: warning: unused parameter 'offset'
GLwDrawA.c: In function 'Redraw':
GLwDrawA.c:578: warning: unused parameter 'region'
GLwDrawA.c: In function 'glwInput':
GLwDrawA.c:651: warning: unused parameter 'params'
GLwDrawA.c:651: warning: unused parameter 'numParams'
g++ -Wall -shared -DNO_REGEXPR -DGNU -o libAW.so AW_xkey.o AW_xfont.o
AW_nawar.o AW_button.o AW_at.o AW_print.o AW_window.o AW_device.o AW_Xm.o
AW_click.o AW_size.o AW_xfig.o AW_xfigfont.o AW_status.o AW_preset.o
AW_question.o AW_global_awars.o AW_font_group.o GLwMDrawA.o GLwDrawA.o
/usr/bin/ld: GLwMDrawA.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can
not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
GLwMDrawA.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [libAW.a] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/arb-0.0.20050526/WINDOW'
When this is fixed there are still other problems which prevent the
package to build sucessfully. At least one of those other problems
also appears on i386.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327059-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 05:55:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 22:55:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ulm.bund.de [194.95.179.208]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDbrZ-0001SI-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:55:49 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by Ulm.bund.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) id HAA09981
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:55:15 +0200
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:54:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#327059: arb: FTBFS (amd64): relocation R_X86_64_32 against
`a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with
-fPIC
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2005 05:54:55.0642 (UTC)
FILETIME=[0102D7A0:01C5B503]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Sep-08 14:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Another question to Andreas: If I exclude amd86 from this architecture list
>> the bug you reported is not really solved but it will not occure any more
>> because it is circumvented. What would you prefer:
>>
>> [ ] Close the bug
>> [ ] Reduce severity to wishlist
>> [ ] Keep as is
>
> Please just close the bug report, thanks.
So I just close the bug.
Thanks for your input anyway
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
