On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:15:25 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

> > I think in this case we can either
[..]
> > (I can't try now but I'm sure Salvatore will be quicker than me :))
> Well I choosed option 1. Did saw your reply only after commiting the
> patch to our svn repo. 

I knew that you would be quicker :)

(Don't worry about my mail, I was just thinking out loud after a very
quick look at Makefile.PL)

> If you have time please review the package. I
> have already sent a unblock request [1], but we can change the request
> if we want one of the other solutions.

I guess that's the most simple and minimal change, so if it works I
agree we should choose it.
 
Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-    NP: Arlo Guthrie: Alice's Restaurant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to