Your message dated Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:17:07 +0000
with message-id <e1p2nit-0005l8...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#597940: fixed in apt-dater 0.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597940,
regarding wrong debconf usage, not respecting users choice
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-dater-host
Severity: serious

apt-dater-host uses debconf wrongly, you should use Choices-C instead of
'translating' booleans into 0 and 1.

currently, it's not remembering the users choice and *always* enabling
automated updates after a reconfigure or update, which is a serious bug.

---snip---
r...@bob:~# dpkg-reconfigure -plow -freadline apt-dater-host
Configuring apt-dater-host
--------------------------

If you disable this option, you have to acknowledge every upgrade
process for
all hosts. The pro of it would be, that you will be aware of every
action apt
wants to do. The con is, that you have to attach every host on multiple
upgrades
and acknowledge every single host.

Enable automatic upgrades? no


r...@bob:~# debconf-get-selections | grep apt-dater
apt-dater-host  apt-dater-host/assume_yes       boolean false
r...@bob:~# dpkg-reconfigure -pcritical -freadline apt-dater-host
r...@bob:~# debconf-get-selections | grep apt-dater
apt-dater-host  apt-dater-host/assume_yes       boolean 1
r...@bob:~#
---snap---

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-dater
Source-Version: 0.8.4-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-dater, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-dater-dbg_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
  to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater-dbg_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
apt-dater-host_0.8.4-2_all.deb
  to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater-host_0.8.4-2_all.deb
apt-dater_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.gz
apt-dater_0.8.4-2.dsc
  to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater_0.8.4-2.dsc
apt-dater_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
  to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater_0.8.4-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 597...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Patrick Matthäi <pmatth...@debian.org> (supplier of updated apt-dater package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:18:22 +0200
Source: apt-dater
Binary: apt-dater apt-dater-dbg apt-dater-host
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.8.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <pmatth...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi <pmatth...@debian.org>
Description: 
 apt-dater  - terminal-based remote package update manager
 apt-dater-dbg - terminal-based remote package update manager (dbg symbols)
 apt-dater-host - host helper application for apt-dater
Closes: 596723 597935 597936 597940
Changes: 
 apt-dater (0.8.4-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Merge 0.8.4-1~bpo50+1 changelog.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1 (no changed needed).
   * Mention apt-dater-host in the long description of apt-dater.
     Closes: #597935
   * Downgrade sudo dependency to recommends.
     Closes: #597936
   * Add patch 01-no-sudo-with-aptitude.diff from upstream svn. aptitude does
     not need root privileges since Squeeze to check for updates.
     Closes: #596723
   * Add missing perl:Depends.
   * Fixed debconf does not respect users choice. Thanks for the patch to Daniel
     Baumann. Bumping urgency to high.
     Closes: #597940
   * Suggest mc with the apt-dater package. mc is used for file transfers.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 f71be48bfebae95a74bc36ec56ad49c92b7e2446 1786 apt-dater_0.8.4-2.dsc
 c5b6679e47eb713f34dd4147eaf040d52584a3b1 12053 apt-dater_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.gz
 da93b3b6193282d6d49084f71b44ebdfc2b190e0 14906 apt-dater-host_0.8.4-2_all.deb
 f5e861069d4e27f3e3a37d0b3565f9af90da5b04 71750 apt-dater_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
 4d986f6d8c411f33a960dd9e3cf185e7edb3a1dd 72818 apt-dater-dbg_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 39bda4f281d72902681c42cd573667a8b04141d0363da9ce67844d552563c3ba 1786 
apt-dater_0.8.4-2.dsc
 7949088a0c7e99e19a8d2f924674ddb587103dee3d31c1a181b864102ded1114 12053 
apt-dater_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.gz
 23a184aa25a0960c1314a6ca0bea96adf3c974218a4eb0523fe1fd6491b2334e 14906 
apt-dater-host_0.8.4-2_all.deb
 468d7181b5a6ff4fa3564169c45d88100b4d1941c763b06c35838d8032784f1c 71750 
apt-dater_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
 b73f37b24ea8bd3d13c1f252e7cdf0a0e40c571393357abffbc866a58ef7450b 72818 
apt-dater-dbg_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
Files: 
 5e175f05d0f769d1974d9d0043d1a8f2 1786 admin optional apt-dater_0.8.4-2.dsc
 6e9de9de36b63d013adba93a711efc60 12053 admin optional 
apt-dater_0.8.4-2.debian.tar.gz
 895f21acf8189f1f47c66e65aa15babb 14906 admin optional 
apt-dater-host_0.8.4-2_all.deb
 677ec6d2393b8f3426c2145ad4634b9c 71750 admin optional 
apt-dater_0.8.4-2_i386.deb
 630574db2b987d03f295419cefd560ff 72818 debug extra 
apt-dater-dbg_0.8.4-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMqfohAAoJEBLZsEqQy9jk1CsP/j+RNpvu8sAX/YEye3kGWbbz
eu1p0Fa+4u6cRDHsE2tIXhzjmrwzRrj6+zm5JJ5ZguDB7WT2128vEaXc9yf/24Jj
Cc9LFECT8Q+JCeaoGDXUKwetcBOYecdx2nRayEXZSlnN2saA35+fvldVrGg18JJH
5EQLZHwuZ7NQTHRtkXwdQYlbC2p8mrpkQe47kN5nlejCBgk4EJJUD19U86MJBH8W
wAHgeh3CcpTtNUmuBKsuAmz/g6hk6KrMKI++BjRENINEPKfeRsV50tkR8Z9AdgLR
DcK1FdTAKXcOmqvlgFuT18u1DcELWSA+JSkgtDsk7hsuPrQ3K8SHXnQa8eRZZVLB
FX5RmyqtS3X+aWT2JLCaPgN3NFOF4IomdVc74V+po6NvtOydHu28cEAbtFIMudiW
kvUW+NGhETMKweqRjv1S5/C/JiLL+DshC1UGsrpS4bbeu2UpdUg/Nci5++eujO91
RauxqlcmFPZ70gLQdng8yUUZAnqqxd246PujDOLrtoWPCLnuCHQTgsLG2QvdKOXp
dbQ+tULg0DUvukDUrkLMsqsCnJesl2EhedheLSb58E/Ky0T60AJj8qJ780vsH7Kf
5iWA6gYWMEDroBbiX9hcx/Rd14Z+aIQWUuuJfH62YBUGSuSxEDYOTGqeuqpFRn8u
no8z6zq6Mz0l2uuKRzfV
=jE8m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to