On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:59:02AM +0300, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > The Anarcat wrote: > > > Seems to me this is a regression from the last security upgrade. > [...] > > What am I missing here? > > Rather than a security advisory, it's from a stable point release, > unfortunately.
I understand that, but how does that keep us from issuing another update on security.debian.org? > volatile and s-p-u are the only ways I know of to quickly address > errata like this. People running stable are not necessarily running volatile and s-p-u. I don't object to uploading to s-p-u at first, but keeping there seems non-sensical: Debian, that stable distribution we all hold so dear has now a broken git package that cannot do *anything* anymore. I find that is a shame and should be fixed ASAP. volatile, proposed-updates and backports are not enough. A. -- Antoine Beaupré Réseau Koumbit Networks +1.514.387.6262
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
