Hi, On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 17:48, Sergei Golovan <sgolo...@nes.ru> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: >> Hello, >> it seems all the blocking bugs has been fixed and even dak rm shows >> only this rdepends problem when removing tcl8.3: >> >> Checking reverse dependencies... >> # Broken Depends: >> tk8.3: tk8.3 >> tk8.3-dev >> >> # Broken Build-Depends: >> tk8.3: tcl8.3-dev (>= 8.3.5) >> >> but I suppose tk8.3 is going away to? >> >> Can we push the removal of tcl8.3 then? > > I see that isdnutils in testing still depends on tcl8.3. So, after the > new isdnutils hit squeeze it'll be time to remove tcl8.3 from testing > (and from unstable as well).
ah perfect (i did the check only in unstable). I just requested an unblock for isdnutils (since there wasn't a request for that yet) and added in X-Debugs-CC you, so you can track that. I think, anyhow, that you can ask the removal of tcl8.3 from unstable, since the isdnutils depends on that only in testing, and once it migrates it will "set tcl8.3 free" and it will be semi-auto-removed. Anyhow, it's up to you :) (I just stumbled upon this bug and given a heads-up). Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
