Your message dated Tue, 06 Sep 2005 01:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325853: fixed in medussa 0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 10:31:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 03:31:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EAPsj-0004Nq-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:31:49 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
        id C7C687049; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:31:48 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: medussa: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G3juXO9GfR42w+sw"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--G3juXO9GfR42w+sw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: medussa
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: grave

The current version of medussa is not installable in unstable, because
it still depends on libgmp3.  The libgmp3 package has been renamed to
libgmp3c2 due to the C++ ABI transition; even if your package does not
use the C++ bindings, it will need to be rebuilt so that it is
installable again.

Since updating glibc in testing is now held up by the libgmp3
transition, medussa/0.8-2 will be removed from testing so that it
doesn't block the rest of the archive from being updated.  It can get
back into testing as soon as this bug is fixed.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--G3juXO9GfR42w+sw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDFYcUKN6ufymYLloRArXqAJ9za3FywiOVp5DzmwwJX2dbWwvzKACfYnbH
tAVnmKHveWJDSk6+2g/1wfI=
=MDP/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G3juXO9GfR42w+sw--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325853-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 08:19:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 01:19:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ECYdg-0000Lu-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 01:17:08 -0700
From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325853: fixed in medussa 0.8-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 01:17:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: medussa
Source-Version: 0.8-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
medussa, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

medussa_0.8-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/medussa/medussa_0.8-3.diff.gz
medussa_0.8-3.dsc
  to pool/main/m/medussa/medussa_0.8-3.dsc
medussa_0.8-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/medussa/medussa_0.8-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Samuele Giovanni Tonon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated medussa package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  6 Sep 2005 10:02:34 +0200
Source: medussa
Binary: medussa
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 medussa    - Distributed password cracking system
Closes: 325853 326322
Changes: 
 medussa (0.8-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed build depends for libgmp3 and libreadline (Closes: #325853)
     (Closes: #326322)
Files: 
 fdec0bd1a69d09d62f71a3c48499a627 624 admin optional medussa_0.8-3.dsc
 fe131c33371da8fcafc7d6cf1655ceee 27024 admin optional medussa_0.8-3.diff.gz
 f1a5ccf512f1ed90315e90f2ab76b7b0 118452 admin optional medussa_0.8-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDHU5qzvFcH/JZfgQRAnR1AJ4zUZ8KpFUCJ+kDXgdl0Xphyx0Z1QCcDajN
7Gomv3bJfgjAiNOKZb+g1gk=
=pk4j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to