On 07/09/10 at 11:36 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-09-07 01:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 
> > Package: emacs23
> > Version: 23.2+1-4
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: squeeze sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
> > to build on amd64.
> >
> > Relevant part:
> > [...]
> >> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> >> E: Package 'mailx' has no installation candidate
> 
> This is certainly a bug in emacs23 (it should build-depend on
> bsd-mailx | mailx), but I wonder why this happens on your system and
> not on the buildds, see the amd64 log¹ for instance:
> 
> ,----
> | Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> | E: Package mailx has no installation candidate
> | mailx is a virtual package provided by: mailutils heirloom-mailx bsd-mailx
> | Using mailutils (no default, using first one)
> `----

Interesting. I'm not sure. I *think* that the buildds now use sbuild
from unstable/testing, not a fork. So we should use the same version.

Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to