Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:03:49 +0200
with message-id <20100906180349.ge14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595794: webkit: uninstallable on amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #595794,
regarding webkit: uninstallable on amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
595794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: webkit
version: 1.2.4-1
severity: grave
the amd64 package is currently uninstallable due to dependency on gtk2 >= 2.21,
but only version 2.20 is available in unstable. the package was probably built
in the wrong environment again:
$ sudo apt-get install libwebkit-1.0-2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libwebkit-1.0-2 : Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.21.6) but it is not
going to be installed
Depends: libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.21.6) but 2.20.1-1+b1 is to be
installed
E: Broken packages
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 13:48:10 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> package: webkit
> version: 1.2.4-1
> severity: grave
>
> the amd64 package is currently uninstallable due to dependency on gtk2
> >= 2.21, but only version 2.20 is available in unstable. the package
> >was probably built in the wrong environment again:
>
binnmu scheduled. kov, please don't do this...
julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
