On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 22:49:00 +0200 (+0200), Stefan Fritsch wrote: [snip]
My sincere apologies for the delay in replying - I thought I had but I see now that I didn't. A great bit of work there tracking down the problem and workarounds :-) > Out of interest: Have you noticed any performance difference with > sslmutex sem instead of the default 'file'? The description of the > types on http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/misc/perf-tuning.html says > that the semaphore mutex types are somewhat less robust. I've not noticed any problems (nor measured any performance increases, if any). The posixsem type doesn't seem _too_ bad, the sysvmem one certainly does. Possibly a little experiment if I find myself bored one weekend :-) Cheers, Adrian -- bitcube.co.uk - Expert Linux infrastructure consultancy Puppet, Debian, Red Hat, Ubuntu, CentOS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
