severity 519316 serious thanks Hi!
Not that the different severity matters that much but I think it's a bit more accurate, as inetd works perfectly fine if one edits inetd.conf and uses a different proto entry. On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 20:38:34 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > severity 519316 grave > thanks > The fix in Debian Edus case is to probably switch back to > openbsd-inetd, which is the inetd version we used in Lenny, as it do > not have this problem and its init.d script make sure the daemon do > not start if there are no services to serve, saving a little bit of > memory and CPU time on the machines. inetutils-inetd does not start either if there's no services present. > Not quite sure why tasksel started installing inetutils-inetd instead > of openbsd-inetd between Lenny and Squeeze, but we will do our best to > make sure inetutils-inetd is not the one selected in the future for > Debian Edu. tasksel does not pull inetd, only packages needing it should be pulling it, and the default inetd should be openbsd-inetd, if you are getting inetutils-inetd instead it's either because you are installing any of inetutils-* packages (which pull inetutils-inetd as first option) or there's a bug in some dependency on one of the packages pulling inet-superserver, for example by only depending on the virtual package, which might make apt pull the first alphabetical package providing it. I'll be fixing this bug in next release anyway, though. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
