Your message dated Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:20:46 +0200
with message-id <4c55f33e.7040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#572641: partimage in "Packages-arch-specific"
blacklisted for 64bit but availalbe for amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #572641,
regarding partimage in "Packages-arch-specific" blacklisted for 64bit but
availalbe for amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
572641: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572641
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
The information in Packages-arch-specific says:
%partimage: !ia64 !alpha !amd64 !kfreebsd-amd64 # 64-bit
is br0ken
But amd64 packages are availalbe via a binNMU. The changelog mentions
some fixes and partimage builds fine (and is able to create images)
on amd64. Is that a leftover? Or is it still broken and the amd64
version is there by accident?
Please clarify :)
Thanks,
Michael
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers lucid
APT policy: (500, 'lucid')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-14-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 26.07.2010 13:00, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> [2010-07-11 14:33:04 CEST]:
>> so now that Kurt reassigned this bug to partimage and bumped it to
>> serious(?), I wonder what to do about this.
>
> I'd like to also question the bump to serious - from what I understood
> it's meant to get tested, but that doesn't sound like it's known broken,
> and having a release blocking bugreport because of potential issues
> sounds a bit fishy to me.
>
> Can this be lowered again?
As Kurt has removed the P-a-s entries, I guess this bug can be closed
altogether.
If there is disagreement, please reopen.
Michael.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
