Your message dated Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:00:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Officially fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 13:37:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 06:37:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E12OG-00014k-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:37:36 -0700
Received: (qmail 6283 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2005 13:37:04 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 5 Aug 2005 13:37:04 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 963FDBBE75; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:37:01 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dosemu is not installable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 15:37:01 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: dosemu
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: serious
dosemu depends on slang1 that is no longer available.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321432-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 23:00:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 16:00:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBKWd-0001Rf-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:00:47 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EBKWd-0005XS-Eh
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:00:47 -0700
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Officially fixed
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "Who drank the last beer?" Tom asked, hopping mad
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:00:47 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BLANK_LINES_70_80
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 1.2.1-3.1
This bug was just fixed, QA-maintained packages don't have NMUs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
