On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 20:59:47 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> >> The authors are:
> >>
> >> // SHA-1 SSE2 implementation, (C) 2008 Alvaro Salmador
> >> (napla...@msn.com), ported from Simon Marechal's SHA-1 MMX
> >> // SHA-1 MMX implementation, (C) 2005 Simon Marechal (si...@banquise.net)
> >>
> >> Missing licence has been forwarded to upstream, see [1]
> >> for details
> > 
> > 
> > FWIW:  There seems to be a GPLed version of that code floating arround,
> > see for example
> > http://pyrit.googlecode.com/svn-history/r150/trunk/pyrit/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu_sse2.S.
> > However, I couldn't really trace that file back, but perhaps it helps
> > nonetheless.
> 
> I'm packaging Pyrit for Debian, that's how I noticed the missing
> copyright. I initially traced this file back to aircrack-ng, and thought
> the cause was there.
> 
> In the meantime, my upstream has informed me that he had independently
> confirmed GPLv3+ with Alvaro prior to inclusion in Pyrit, but I do not
> know as of yet the status regarding Simon.
> 
> I pointed my upstream to the aircrack-ng ticket, and will reply here as
> soon as I find out more.
> 
Can't these packages use libcrypto (not gpl-compatible, so maybe not the
best idea in all cases) or libgcrypt or some other crypto library
instead of having their own sha1 implementations?

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to