On 2010-06-05 09:00 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> This is a problem of libdirectfb-1.2.9 which ought not to conflict with >> libdirectfb-1.2-0. > > wrong, libdirectfb-1.2.9 should conflict against libdirectfb-1.2-0. > There's conflicting files on armel architecture.
Did you look at the file conflicts and try to resolve them, e.g. by moving the offending files? And why do you declare a Conflicts: libdirectfb-1.2-0 on *all* architectures rather than only on armel? > We have done a directfb transition. > Most of the packages should have been rebuilt against latest directfb > (and depends on libdirectfb-1.2.9). > > Do you have some libxine2* packages, still depending on libdirectfb-1.2-0 ? I don't, but Juhapekka is running a mixed stable/testing system where your Conflicts: libdirectfb-1.2-0 makes partial upgrades impossible. This is not how library transitions are supposed to be handled, please make sure that the next libdirectfb-x.y.z packages do not share files with libdirectfb-1.2-9. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
