Your message dated Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:48:09 +0100
with message-id <20100601114809.ge12...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#584062: sdf: Security bugs in ghostscript
has caused the Debian Bug report #584062,
regarding sdf: Security bugs in ghostscript
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
584062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584062
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sdf
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please note remote execute-any-code security bugs in ghostscript:
http://bugs.debian.org/583183
This package suggests ghostscript, and may be affected. Please
evaluate the security of this package, and fix if needed.
Thanks,
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-pk03.17-svr (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages sdf depends on:
ii perl 5.10.0-19lenny2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
sdf recommends no packages.
Versions of packages sdf suggests:
ii ghostscript-x [gs] 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny1 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
ii gs 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny1 Transitional package
pn htmldoc <none> (no description available)
ii perl-doc 5.10.0-19lenny2 Perl documentation
pn sdf-doc <none> (no description available)
pn sgmltools-lite <none> (no description available)
ii tetex-bin 2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny2 TeX Live: teTeX transitional packa
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:21:58PM +1000, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Your explanation shows you are not directly responsible (maybe not
> vulnerable at all), and can close the bug.
OK, thanks for the confirmation. Closing.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--- End Message ---
