Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org> wrote: Hi,
>> #2 0xb6e9da09 in sane_control_option (h=0x8232858, opt=10, >> act=SANE_ACTION_GET_VALUE, val=0x0, >> info=0xb249c1ac) at dll-s.c:36 >> #3 0xb6eb7f66 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnome-scan-1.0/libgsane.so > > Let’s ask the Sane maintainer his opinion. Julien, do you think this is > more likely a bug in the hpaio backend, or a bug in the way gnome-scan > calls sane_control_option ? In this case, gnome-scan is requesting the value of option 10 but passing a NULL pointer as the destination for this value. I can't think of a case for which val=NULL would be valid on a GET_VALUE call, of the top of my head. A backtrace with hpaio debug symbols (if available?) would be nice. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <jbla...@debian.org> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
