On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:24:47PM +0200, sean finney wrote: > hiya, Hi there,
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:14:16PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > > Since I honestly don't know that much here, I think it would be best that > > you > > forward this to upstream, to get it integrated. In the meantime, I'll > > upload a > > patched version next week with your diff. > > i sent an email to the upstream author last weekend but it sounds like > he's on vacation. i'll open an actual issue in their ticketing system > this weekend if i can get some time. Did you manage to do this? I haven't seen any bug, maybe I just didn't query correctly. > also, in case it wasn't totally clear, you will need a fix for the two > hashing functions mentioned earlier in the BR. in my own tests i switched > it back to doing an XOR of the two values, which perhaps isn't ideal but > ought to work without ill effect. In case you still have these patches, could you attach them to the bug? thanks, iustin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
