block 529478 with 577875 thanks Hello Adam,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 07:33:47AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 10:29 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 à 10:11 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > > > > ********************************************************************************* > > > > UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS (see configure.log > > > > for details): > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > You set a value for --with-blas-lib=<lib> and --with-lapack-lib=<lib>, > > > > but ['-lblas-3gf'] and ['-llapackgf-3'] cannot be used > > > > ********************************************************************************* > > Sounds like this bug is due to a recent update of blas/lapack. > > -lblas-3gf & -llapackgf-3 have been removed from alternative. > > I looked for usage of this but I didn't know that people were still > > using it. > > Replacing -lblas-3gf => -lblas & -llapackgf-3 => -llapack should fix it. > > Thanks Sylvestre. I've done that for another package, and petsc has a > few open bugs, so this will push me to fix a bunch of things. > > This may have to wait a week or so. I'll get to it as soon as I can. could you please give it a look as soon as possible? this bug is blocking the resolution for petsc4py RC bug (that in turn is blocking the py2.6 transition). Thanks in advance for your understanding. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
