Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:28:50 +0300
with message-id <20100418062850.ga5...@madeleine.local.invalid>
and subject line Re: Bug#577209: libdbi-perl: DBI<>DBD ABI change breaks 
partial upgrades
has caused the Debian Bug report #577209,
regarding libdbi-perl: DBI<>DBD ABI change breaks partial upgrades
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
577209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


It looks like the arch:any packages build-depending on libdbi-perl
need binNMUs against the new libdbi-perl 1.610.90-1.

Please note that libdbd-mysql-perl already saw a sourceful upload;
I've now locally verified that libdbd-sqlite3-perl errors out and
works after a rebuild.

If my grep-dctrl foo worked this should be:

nmu libdbd-odbc-perl_1.23-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-pg-perl_2.17.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-sqlite2-perl_2:0.33-8 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-sqlite3-perl_1.29-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbd-sybase-perl_1.00-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libdbix-oo-perl_0.0.9-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu libpoe-component-dbiagent-perl_0.26-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new 
libdbi-perl."
nmu libtfbs-perl_0.5.svn.20091128-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new 
libdbi-perl."
nmu olive_1.3-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."
nmu sympa_5.4.7-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against new libdbi-perl."


Cheers,
gregor, who hopes he got his first binNMU request right

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=R2TB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.610.90+is+1.609-1

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:28:03AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
 
> > > > > B2. binNMU libdbd-*-perl [1] again with a dep-wait on the new 
> > > > > libdbi-perl;
> > > > >     wait until the currently broken binNMUs in squeeze are superseded
 
> Now filed as #578105.

The binNMUs have been scheduled and no further source changes are needed
for this issue.  I'm closing the bug at 1.610.90+is+1.609-1 so that it
can reach testing normally.

The next step is to make libdbd-*-perl depend on perl-dbdabi-xx; after
that libdbi-perl can be updated to the new ABI level in a controlled way.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to