On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 04:52:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 08:08:45PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > gnome-vfs2 is currently kept out of testing because of a RC bug
> > requesting its rebuild against a transitionned fam, for the C++
> > transition (#319833). This bug was tagged as "sid" by Steve Langasek.
>
> > While this is trivial to fix, building a transitionned gnome-vfs2 would
> > put the package behind the transition of fam to testing. Fam is deeply
> > stuck behind a libc6 bug, #318429
>
> > Either the bug is tagged "testing" (after all, this issue is in testing
> > too) and the current version transitions, or another gnome-vfs2 is
> > uploaded, but we wait for libc6, and fam.
>
> > Let me know what you prefer.
>
> I have already added a hint telling britney to ignore this bug when
> considering the gnome-vfs2 update for testing. This is an RC-severity bug,
> but it only applies to the version in unstable at present, and getting GNOME
> 2.10 into testing and unblocking the many packages currently stuck in
> unstable should be a higher priority at the moment than rebuilding against
> the latest fam. That rebuild can easily be done once GNOME 2.10 has reached
> testing, without causing problems for hundreds of other packages and
> complicating transitions to etch.
>
> So, please just ignore this bug until gnome-vfs2 2.10.1 has reached testing.
Is it still usefull to ignore this bug? gnome-vfs2 needs to wait for
gnome-panel (as it conflicts with the current gnome-panel in testing), which
is waiting for evolution-data-server, which is stuck behind libc..
Sjoerd
--
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
-- Albert Einstein
