Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 317839 2.7.0-6 Bug#317839: should include <limits.h>, not "limits.h" Bug marked as found in version 2.7.0-6.
> found 317839 2.7.0-6sarge1 Bug#317839: should include <limits.h>, not "limits.h" Bug marked as found in version 2.7.0-6sarge1. > found 317839 2.6.6.1-5.2 Bug#317839: should include <limits.h>, not "limits.h" Bug marked as found in version 2.6.6.1-5.2. > The last item may not be terribly relevant; I'm not sure it is reasonable Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > to expect things to work with GCC 4.0 on oldstable, really. However, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > the versions for both stable and proposed-stable exhibit the behavior Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > documented in this bug, as best I can tell, if you use GCC 4.0 on Sarge - Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > which is normally a somewhat more reasonable proposition, if working with Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
