Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:02:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297957: fixed in vls 0.5.4+cvs20031028-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 18:08:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 10:08:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D6ujy-0002JC-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:08:02 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
        id 1D6vgI-000512-3B; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:08:18 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vls: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'u32' loses precision
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:08:18 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: vls
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'vls' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

else rm -f ".deps/dummyinterface_la-dummyinterface.Tpo"; exit 1; \
fi
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -O2 -MT 
dummyinterface_la-dummyinterface.lo -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/dummyinterface_la-dummyinterface.Tpo -c dummyinterface.cpp -o 
dummyinterface_la-dummyinterface.o
../../core/hashtable.cpp: In member function 'u32 
C_HashMethod<void*>::Hash(void*) const':
../../core/hashtable.cpp:100: error: cast from 'void*' to 'u32' loses precision
make[7]: *** [dummyinterface_la-dummyinterface.lo] Error 1
make[7]: Leaving directory `/vls-0.5.4+cvs20031028/src/modules/dummyinterface'

With the attached patch 'vls' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/vls-0.5.4+cvs20031028/src/core/hashtable.cpp 
./src/core/hashtable.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/vls-0.5.4+cvs20031028/src/core/hashtable.cpp    2003-10-10 
02:46:40.000000000 +0200
+++ ./src/core/hashtable.cpp    2005-03-03 19:17:44.300093892 +0100
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
 
 u32 C_HashMethod<handle>::Hash(handle hKey) const
 {
-  return (u32)hKey % m_uiMaxHash;
+  return (unsigned long)hKey % m_uiMaxHash;
 }
 
 

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297957-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 14:08:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 07:08:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E7vpr-00061H-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:02:35 -0700
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#297957: fixed in vls 0.5.4+cvs20031028-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:02:35 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: vls
Source-Version: 0.5.4+cvs20031028-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vls, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vls/vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5.diff.gz
vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vls/vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5.dsc
vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vls/vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated vls 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:15:47 +0200
Source: vls
Binary: vls
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4+cvs20031028-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 vls        - lightweight MPEG and DVD video streaming server
Closes: 297957
Changes: 
 vls (0.5.4+cvs20031028-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control:
     + Build-depend on a newer version of libdvbpsi.
     + Set policy to 3.6.2.1.
   * src/core/hashtable.cpp:
     + Fixed a 64-bit FTBFS (Closes: #297957).
Files: 
 5f9999abab1b60a448014184ecd289f3 707 net optional vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5.dsc
 92056975125cee3d0712c50ca76ae5f6 3902 net optional 
vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5.diff.gz
 5dda37c124a6f8c01cfdc5bfa93a442a 399558 net optional 
vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDDHi4fPP1rylJn2ERApgFAJ9H1iaLbLY2vsrxI5Guoxg5l6gj4gCfdJek
fThU2KpW3XqalV/1nxybmnA=
=3lEg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to