Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:21:55 +0100
with message-id <20100317192155.c32c2fcf....@firenze.linux.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#574341: apt-listbugs doesn't works correctly? no bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #574341,
regarding apt-listbugs doesn't works correctly? no bugs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
574341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574341
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
so.. I think apt-listbugs doesn't have any bugs
but using reportbug apt-listbugs:
Getting status for apt-listbugs...
Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
Will send report to Debian (per lsb_release).
Querying Debian BTS for reports on apt-listbugs (source)...
32 bug reports found:
1) #493632 apt-listbugs: should try and be more informative on "invalid
date" SOAP parsing error
2) #499657 texlive-latex-base not working with apt-listbugs
3) #536613 apt-listbugs: lists no bugs and returns 0 for non existing
packages
4) #539487 apt-listbugs: does not work via proxy using windows style user
names
5) #574075 apt-listbugs: Should not depends on transitional
libhttp-access2-ruby1.8 package
[...]
is this a bug?
thanks
Pol
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.12-pollon (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii apt 0.7.25.3 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libdpkg-ruby1.8 0.3.6 modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii libgettext-ruby1.8 2.1.0-1 Gettext for ruby1.8
ii libhttp-access2-ruby1.8 2.1.5.2-2 HTTP accessing library for ruby (t
ii libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8] 1.8.7.249-1 Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-4 Interface of expat for the scripti
ii ruby 4.2 An interpreter of object-oriented
apt-listbugs recommends no packages.
Versions of packages apt-listbugs suggests:
ii debianutils 3.2.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii epiphany-browser [www-browser 2.29.3-1 Intuitive GNOME web browser
ii iceweasel [www-browser] 3.5.8-1 Web browser based on Firefox
ii reportbug 4.10.2 reports bugs in the Debian distrib
ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.2-4 WWW browsable pager with excellent
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
notfound 574341 apt-listbugs/0.1.3
thanks
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:58:45 +0100 Pol Hallen wrote:
[...]
> Hi
Hi.
>
> apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
> Reading package fields... Done
> Reading package status... Done
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
>
> so.. I think apt-listbugs doesn't have any bugs
Right, apt-listbugs doesn't have any *release-critical* bugs.
Or, to be more precise, it didn't have, before you filed this one...
> but using reportbug apt-listbugs:
[...]
> Querying Debian BTS for reports on apt-listbugs (source)...
> 32 bug reports found:
[...]
> is this a bug?
No, this is not a bug.
I am therefore closing this report.
As the man page states (in the OPTIONS section):
| · -s <severities> | --severity <severities> Severities you want
| to see separated by comma, possible values are critical, grave,
| serious, important, normal, minor and wishlist. Default: [criti‐
| cal,grave,serious] You can specify '--severity all' to specify
| all severities.
apt-listbugs only cares about release-critical bugs (i.e.: bugs
of severity "critical", "grave", or "serious").
If you want to list all bugs, you should specify '--severity all':
$ apt-listbugs -s all list apt-listbugs
> thanks
You're welcome.
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpUdRoMlj1AU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
