Hi everybody. Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone from the AMD64 port please comment on and deal with this > bug report: > > * Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-22 01:19]: >> Package: libopencdk4 >> Version: 1:0.4.2-4 >> Severity: grave >> Justification: Breaks installation >> >> When I was trying to install SID with a recent installer nightly (which >> I assume doesn't diminish the relevance of this particular report), >> the installation would fail on account of this package. Because >> the priority of the package is 'important', the installer tries >> to install it automatically, but it depends on libgcrypt1, which is not >> in unstable (or testing or stable). >> >> I notice that packages.debian.org lists libopencdk4 as being >> available only for amd64, and as this package is quite old, >> I figure that it should simply be dropped. >> >> In trying to find reports of this problem, I found bug 272586, >> which was supposed to have been fixed by changing the priority >> of this package, amongst others. > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > http://www.cyrius.com/ >From what I see (as non dak admin) the package should not be in the archive (anymore). The following packages exists in the DB: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ madison libopencdk4 libopencdk4 | 1:0.4.2-4 | unstable | amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ madison opencdk opencdk | 1:0.4.2-4 | unstable | source [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ madison opencdk8 opencdk8 | 0.5.5-10 | stable | source opencdk8 | 0.5.7-2 | testing | source opencdk8 | 0.5.7-2 | unstable | source But the overrides, synced nightly from Debian, say only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/amd64.debian.net$ grep opencdk scripts/override/*sid* scripts/override/override.sid.main:libopencdk8-dev optional libdevel scripts/override/override.sid.main:libopencdk8-dbg extra libdevel scripts/override/override.sid.main:libopencdk8 important libs scripts/override/override.sid.main.src:opencdk8 libs Going by the opencdk bugreport the package was removed around August 1st. Plenty of time for the amd64 rene to recommend its removal. Yet it still remains. An ftp-master might have to intervene, that means Ganneff or Aba. I messaged Ganneff on irc about this and he usualy reads the amd64 list anyway. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]