Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324588: fixed in belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2005 21:18:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 22 14:18:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (frobnitz.homelinux.net) [67.188.213.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E7JgJ-0008AU-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:18:11 -0700
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E7JgF-0002ZA-WB
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:18:09 -0700
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Cannot apply patches
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:18:03 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: belocs-locales-data
Severity: serious
Version: 2.3.4-18

>From my build log (reproduced using pbuilder in an i386 chroot):

...
patching file localedata/locales/mn_MN
can't find file to patch at input line 23610
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: belocs-locales-data/locale/CVS/Entries
|===================================================================
|--- belocs-locales-data.orig/locale/CVS/Entries
|+++ belocs-locales-data/locale/CVS/Entries
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
...
Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply (enforce with -f)
make: *** [debian/stamp-patched] Error 1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324588-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2005 23:08:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 22 16:08:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E7LIs-0003QY-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:02:06 -0700
From: Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324588: fixed in belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-19
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:02:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: belocs-locales-data
Source-Version: 2.3.4-19

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
belocs-locales-data, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/belocs-locales-data/belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19.diff.gz
belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19.dsc
  to pool/main/b/belocs-locales-data/belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19.dsc
belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/belocs-locales-data/belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated belocs-locales-data 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:29:04 +0200
Source: belocs-locales-data
Binary: belocs-locales-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.4-19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 belocs-locales-data - base files for localization
Closes: 324588
Changes: 
 belocs-locales-data (2.3.4-19) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Modified patch:
     + update_CVS.diff
       Fix again FTBFS due to CVS administrative files.  Closes: #324588
       Thanks Daniel Schepler for your report.
Files: 
 e5461c13306c3dbf4b7e4cb80c761124 655 misc extra 
belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19.dsc
 ff44b2ed6d15336ff570f208e3e5b236 720294 misc extra 
belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19.diff.gz
 5ecb760dfc39f0b470783363e0041dfc 3969478 misc extra 
belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-19_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDClXy8Ri1lR4WGvsRAlMmAJ9H+zUDElZwQ7UbIuxjrMuDnqMWTgCfRCbj
IJlSY+EPcq0gK29Zl13k0zs=
=vE3w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to