Your message dated Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:32:23 +0100
with message-id <8b2d7b4d1002270132m660f0ba4n28acfe8f2d620...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Package removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #527977,
regarding jruby1.2 contains non-free material
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
527977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jruby1.1
Version: 1.1.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1


This package includes the following files:

/usr/lib/jruby1.1/lib/bsf.jar
/usr/lib/jruby1.1/lib/jruby.jar
/usr/lib/jruby1.1/lib/profile.jar

which correspond to the following files in the source tarball:

build_lib/asm-3.0.jar
build_lib/asm-analysis-3.0.jar
build_lib/asm-commons-3.0.jar
build_lib/asm-tree-3.0.jar
build_lib/asm-util-3.0.jar
build_lib/bnd-0.0.249.jar *
build_lib/bytelist-1.0.1.jar *
build_lib/constantine.jar *
build_lib/dynalang-0.3.jar *
build_lib/invokedynamic.jar *
build_lib/jcodings.jar *
build_lib/jline-0.9.93.jar
build_lib/jna.jar
build_lib/jna-posix.jar
build_lib/joda-time-1.5.1.jar
build_lib/joni.jar *
build_lib/jvyamlb-0.2.5.jar *
lib/bsf.jar

Also the following files in the source tarball are used during the
build process:

build_lib/backport-util-concurrent.jar *
build_lib/emma_ant.jar
build_lib/emma.jar
build_lib/jarjar-1.0rc8.jar
build_lib/junit.jar
build_lib/retroweaver-2.0.5.jar *
build_lib/retroweaver-rt-2.0.5.jar *

The source package does not include their source code.  This goes
against the DFSG requirement that "the program must include source
code" therefore the package at present should not be in main.
To solve this problem I recommend Depending (or a weaker dependency
if appropriate) and Build-Depending on the following packages:

libasm3-java
libjline-java
libjna-java
libjoda-time-java
libbsf-java

and Build-Depending only on the following:

junit
libemma-java
libjarjar-java

Some of the jar files (marked with *) do not have a package in the
Debian archive; for this package to remain in main the relevant source
code should be found and packaged for Debian and the new packages
should be added to Depends and/or Build-Depends.  Once this process
is complete the package's source tarball should be repackaged not to
include the above listed jar files.

bnd-0.0.249.jar does in fact include source code however as there is
no assurance that the class files were built from this source code,
this jar file should be treated in the same way.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.0-4+rm

Package removed from Debian unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/570521

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to