Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:30:47 +0100
with message-id <20100224073047.ga10...@elende>
and subject line Re: Bug#570944: Package is uninstallable
has caused the Debian Bug report #570944,
regarding Package is uninstallable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
570944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: udav
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
udav and libmgl5 depend on libhdf5-serial-1.8.3 or libhdf5-1.8.3, but there is
no such packages
in debian sid, but libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is exists for most architectures:
http://packages.debian.org/search?
suite=sid§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=libhdf5-serial-1.8
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: udav
Source-Version: 0.5.2-1
Hi
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:43:44PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: udav
> Version: 0.5.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> udav and libmgl5 depend on libhdf5-serial-1.8.3 or libhdf5-1.8.3, but there
> is no such packages
> in debian sid, but libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is exists for most architectures:
> http://packages.debian.org/search?
> suite=sid§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=libhdf5-serial-1.8
Please not that the binNMU was requested and almost all architectures
rebuilded udav (and mathgl) [1].
Bests
Salvatore
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00266.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---