On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:51:49AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Source: quodlibet > Version: 2.2-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > > Hi, > > your package looks like trying to mess with python-support's internal > affairs, and fails to do so: > | debian/rules override_dh_pysupport > | make[1]: Entering directory > `/build/buildd-quodlibet_2.2-1-alpha-2sKZ6e/quodlibet-2.2' > | dh_pysupport > | # kill all the architecture-dependent files in the exfalso package, > | # what's left after pysupport has moved arch-indep files elsewhere > | rm -rf debian/exfalso/usr/lib > | # Kill this modification after the next release. It's just a stray file > | # that got into upstream's release tarball. > | rm debian/exfalso/usr/share/pyshared/quodlibet/qltk/config.py > | rm: cannot remove > `debian/exfalso/usr/share/pyshared/quodlibet/qltk/config.py': No such file or > directory > | make[1]: *** [override_dh_pysupport] Error 1 > | make[1]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd-quodlibet_2.2-1-alpha-2sKZ6e/quodlibet-2.2' > | make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
Hi, I just re-uploaded this package, stripping the stray file from upstream's tarball beforehand instead of trying to clean it up later. (Leaving it in would probably cause byte-compilation explosions on installation.) I find it sort of bizarre that the build did not fail on my local machine while it did on the buildds, however. Do you have any idea why that was the case? regards, Christine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
