Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323962: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 22:59:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 15:59:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-72-224-203-170.maine.res.rr.com (bd-home-comp.no-ip.org) 
[72.224.203.170] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E4RRk-0003ac-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:59:16 -0700
Received: by bd-home-comp.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id B805CA7AA07; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:59:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bryan Donlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libsnmpkit2c2: Needs conflicts with libsnmpkit2c102
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:59:12 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libsnmpkit2c2
Version: 0.9-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

libsnmpkit2c2 is not automatically upgradable using APT from
libsnmpkit2c102:
Unpacking libsnmpkit2c2 (from .../libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-9_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-9_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libsnmpkit.so.2.0.0', which is also in
 package libsnmpkit2c102

libsnmpkit2c2 should have a conflicts line added for libsnmpkit2c102 to
correct this.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libsnmpkit2c2 depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-3    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.0.1-4  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6                    4.0.1-4    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

libsnmpkit2c2 recommends no packages.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323962-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:50:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:50:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E6Ehe-0005GT-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:06 -0700
From: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323962: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-11
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: snmpkit
Source-Version: 0.9-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snmpkit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-11_i386.deb
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-11_i386.deb
snmpkit_0.9-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-11.diff.gz
snmpkit_0.9-11.dsc
  to pool/main/s/snmpkit/snmpkit_0.9-11.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated snmpkit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:37:43 +0200
Source: snmpkit
Binary: libsnmpkit-dev libsnmpkit2c2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libsnmpkit-dev - multithreaded SNMP connection library
 libsnmpkit2c2 - multithreaded SNMP connection library
Closes: 323962 324021
Changes: 
 snmpkit (0.9-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * put Replaces: libsnmp2c102  (closes: #324021)
   * previous version also closes  (closes: #323962)
Files: 
 097dbeed8459ed4c1bb4848f242a4a18 680 libdevel optional snmpkit_0.9-11.dsc
 6f309e5539bf1840c44e5918d7221f45 312224 libdevel optional 
snmpkit_0.9-11.diff.gz
 597f193c7664db64053ec54222b44328 159172 libdevel optional 
libsnmpkit-dev_0.9-11_i386.deb
 9c6a10c7cd51ce5da7a34cb1f7962ac7 62198 libs optional 
libsnmpkit2c2_0.9-11_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDBlHj9B/tjjP8QKQRAr1BAJ9LssyrAKrl2MeG0sIPHO1Y+2CjcQCfcxlV
Fw0khwRswpIRKiFoC2F6+Ps=
=+YBD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to