-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A Mennucc wrote:
> the real problem is that , for some reason, the Conflict
> line in the source is different from the one in the binary package.
> The conflicts line in the binary lacks the "libsnmpkit2c102" entry.
Hmm... weird, its definitely not in the -9 binary package.  I thought
dpkg was being particularly stubborn about it....

However, policy does require a Replaces field too. :)

- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDBkok7ZPKKRJLJvMRAvEzAJ9el8f2Wi7Aw2dWZeEX0HWC6OaQ/QCfb/zC
k0EKzmYu9jaDURNmrmxup28=
=Cdh2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to