Hi Dann,
On 10 February 2010 at 11:12, dann frazier wrote: | Source: quantlib | Version: 1.0.0~20100112-1 | Severity: serious | | >From a recent build attempt on hppa: | [...] | ====================== | Testing QuantLib 1.0b1 | ====================== | *** glibc detected *** /build/buildd-quantlib_1.0.0~20100112-1-hppa-H12qa6/quantlib-1.0.0~20100112/test-suite/.libs/lt-quantlib-test-suite: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938 *** | make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. | make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... | make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. | E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately | make[3]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. | make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... | make[3]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. | make: *** [test-stamp] Terminated | make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2 | Build killed with signal TERM after 300 minutes of inactivity 300 minutes is a long time. What do you suggest we do? I already skip the tests here in debian/rules: cpu := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU) [...] test: test-stamp test-stamp: build-stamp ifeq "$(findstring $(cpu), m68k arm armeb mipsel mips)" "" -LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) check -LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) benchmark endif touch test-stamp It may make sense to add hppa to the list. What do you think? Could you try a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ? Dirk -- Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010 See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org