Package: libsexymm Version: 0.1.9-5 Severity: critical Hi,
do you agree that libsexymm may be removed from the archive? It has no reverse dependencies and depends on libsexy which has seen no update since 2007, and GNOME seems to be trying to get rid of it: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DropLibsexy If you agree that the package may be removed, please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org and retitle it correctly, e.g.: RM: libsexymm -- RoM; not required anymore Regards, Julian -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (350, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
