Andres Mejia wrote: > On Thursday 04 February 2010 04:36:30 Mehdi wrote: >> tags 475279 + patch pending >> tags 555232 + patch pending >> tags 555233 + patch pending >> tags 560468 + patch pending >> thanks >> >> Dear maintainer, >> >> I've prepared an NMU for mediatomb (versioned as 0.12.0~svn2018-4.1) and >> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I >> should delay it longer. >> >> I updated "mediatomb-get-orig-source" to remove the embedded >> prototype.js and use the one from the Debian package libjs-prototype, >> which seems to work fine with the Web UI. > > Thank you. I've applied your patch to the packaging for version > 0.12.0~svn2018-5 and uploaded it, save for one change. I've left out the
Ok. I'll cancel my NMU then as soon as I see 0.12.0~svn2018-5 appear somewhere. I forgot to remove the mediatomb-common.lintian-override which became useless. Please remove it. > change to the meditomb-get-orig-source script, since a new orig tarball is > not > being uploaded. Also, I prefer to implement a way where mediatomb's build Even if you don't upload a new version, having the change applied to the script doesn't harm and doesn't force to upload a new tarball. > system has an option to either use the system libjs-prototype library, or the > internal one. Reason being that using the system library has had other > problems before (web interface being completely unusable). > Yes, I saw that in the bugreports. It appears that libjs-prototype is used by several packages. The maintainer of libjs-prototype (CC'ed) should coordinate with you future uploads and agree on the version you want to have in the distribution (like what's done with C libraries for example). Cheers, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
