severity 555133 important
thanks
Hi, all.
2010/1/26 Andrea Veri <a...@debian.org>:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>
>> I confirmed that obexd-server set it in Conflict in obexd.
>> I think that DBUS-name doen't conflict now because user cannot install
>> these at the same time.
Yes, I know.
I had a talk with upstream, because I didn't conflict each other
However, I knew that each other did not want to change it.
>
> Ideally the best thing to do would be to change the namespaces of the
> obexd-server package so that obexd-server and obex-data-server can be
> used together (if needed).
I am troubled whether I may change it with Debian in DBUS-name.
These do not do conflict when I apply a patch for exclusive use of Debian.
However, this is the method that is not so preferable.
>
> Anyway no GNOME package makes use of obexd-server at the moment, so I
> think that if you are not willing to make the effort of changing the
> namespace yourself, we can just keep the conflicts as they are and
> simply not using the obexd-server package since it doesnt provide what
> we need. You should report this issue to the obexd-server upstream,
> and see if they want to fix this issue or not. ( I don't think they
> will agree with us anyway)
>
OK, I leave this bug as it is.
However, I change severity to important.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
