Hum, I wrote the answer a bit to fast. Binaries of kfreebsd was not removed, but as the package should build nicely with the next upload, it should not be a problem.
Regards, Julien Lavergne Le dimanche 24 janvier 2010 à 23:08 +0100, Julien Lavergne a écrit : > Hi, > > Sorry to not answer earlier, but there is already actions to fix this :) > Binaries of kfreebsd from testing have been removed, and modifications > have been made to build again on kfreebsd, so next upload should fix > this problem. > > Regards, > Julien Lavergne > > Le dimanche 24 janvier 2010 à 21:58 +0000, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > [CCing the submitter rather than assuming they'll see the reply in the > > bug log or on -bugs-rc is generally considered good form... :)] > > > > On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 18:36 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > > > just for the record: the new version does not compile without the two > > > libs. Supporting kfreebsd-* would mean we have to patch the source on > > > the BSDs to use the older version or something. > > > > In that case, you'll need to get the kfreebsd-* binaries removed from > > unstable; as libiphone exists in testing on those architectures > > currently, it won't migrate whilst the outdated kfreebsd-* packages are > > in unstable. > > > > Regards, > > > > Adam > > > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
