On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:15:04 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Package: libsdl1.2-dev > Severity: serious > > Hi, > the SDL -dev package needs to depend at least on libesd0-dev and > libartsc0-dev because the .la file lists those as dependencies. Without > this depending packages fail to build, e.g. gst-plugins
Hmm. $ dpkg --fsys-tarfile libsdl1.2-dev_1.2.14-3_i386.deb |tar xOf - ./usr/lib/libSDL.la # libSDL.la - a libtool library file # Generated by ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 2.2.6 # # Please DO NOT delete this file! # It is necessary for linking the library. # The name that we can dlopen(3). dlname='libSDL-1.2.so.0' # Names of this library. library_names='libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3 libSDL-1.2.so.0 libSDL.so' # The name of the static archive. old_library='libSDL.a' # Linker flags that can not go in dependency_libs. inherited_linker_flags='' # Libraries that this one depends upon. dependency_libs='' # Names of additional weak libraries provided by this library weak_library_names='' # Version information for libSDL. current=11 age=11 revision=3 # Is this an already installed library? installed=yes # Should we warn about portability when linking against -modules? shouldnotlink=no # Files to dlopen/dlpreopen dlopen='' dlpreopen='' # Directory that this library needs to be installed in: libdir='/usr/lib' This looks fine to me... Is it different on other archs, or? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
