Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:24:04 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <20100116112404.71b771...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package bluez-gnome has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #534540,
regarding bluez-gnome: Send and receive broken since last update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
534540: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bluez-gnome
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since I updated to the last bluez-gnome in order to re-enable the obex://
url
in nautilus I can't send or receive files to/from devices.
Browsing works, I can browse the files and delete and copy files from/to
devices. The problem comes when I try to send a file via bluetooth-sendto,
it
asks for the file, asks for the device and then when it tries to send the
file the
transmission never starts and I must click "Cancel", and when I try to send
a
file from the device to the laptop the connection is refused.
The device I'm testing with is a Nokia N95 and it is paired and I put a star
to it (I guess that authorizes/trusts it).
The bluetoth obex push option of nautilus-sendto has dissapeared as reported
in bug #534538.
I have also tried to establish connection laptop <-> desktop and it doesn't
work. The desktop is not updated, so it is working fine (bluetooth obex
option
in nautilus-sendto, sends and receives files). When I try to send a file
from
the desktop to the laptop it says that the laptop does not support OBEX. And
when I try to send a file from the laptop to the desktop is the same as with
any other device, it keeps trying with no success. Both devices trust each
other.
Since I noticed that bluez-gnome now conflicts with gnome-bluetooth I purged
it, but it still doesn't work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (102, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages bluez-gnome depends on:
ii bluez 4.40-2 Bluetooth tools and daemons
ii dbus 1.2.12-1 simple interprocess messaging
syst
ii gconf2 2.26.2-1 GNOME configuration database
syste
ii gnome-icon-t 2.26.0-1 GNOME Desktop icon theme
ii libatk1.0-0 1.26.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.9-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcairo2 1.8.6-2+b1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics
libra
ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.12-1 simple interprocess messaging
syst
ii libdbus-glib 0.80-4 simple interprocess messaging
syst
ii libfontconfi 2.6.0-3 generic font configuration
library
ii libfreetype6 2.3.9-4.1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared
lib
ii libgconf2-4 2.26.2-1 GNOME configuration database
syste
ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.1-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.16.1-2 The GTK+ graphical user
interface
ii libhal1 0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer -
share
ii libnotify1 [ 0.4.5-1 sends desktop notifications to
a n
ii libpango1.0- 1.24.0-3+b1 Layout and rendering of
internatio
ii obex-data-se 0.4.4-2 D-Bus service for OBEX client
and
Versions of packages bluez-gnome recommends:
ii gvfs-backends 1.2.3-1 userspace virtual filesystem -
bac
bluez-gnome suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Jaime Alberto Silva
Socio / Representante Legal
SG Automatización Ltda.
Pereira \ Risaralda \ Colombia
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.8-1+rm
You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/534540 in Debian BTS
against the package bluez-gnome. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/564571. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
