Your message dated Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:46:54 -0800
with message-id <20100103004654.ga23...@jade.home>
and subject line Re: Bug#563438: apt-listbugs: Package has a Depends on
libdpkg-ruby1.8 (>= 0.3.3) which cannot be satisfied
has caused the Debian Bug report #563438,
regarding apt-listbugs: Package has a Depends on libdpkg-ruby1.8 (>= 0.3.3)
which cannot be satisfied
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
563438: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello all,
commit da6864ae240d2ea2458b1c53aca2675ed1985f04 appears to have been
based on assumptions current reality fails to provide:
"Package has a Depends on libdpkg-ruby1.8 (>= 0.3.3) which cannot be
satisfied on *."
<http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=apt-listbugs>
And indeed, such a package version is nowhere to be seen at the moment,
thus rendering apt-listbugs 0.1.2 uninstallable on all architectures.
Ryan, as you intent to adopt dpkg-ruby, I take it you wanted to release
a new version / have released a new version privately already, that
somehow didn't yet make it into the archives?
Cheers,
Flo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'oldstable'), (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (500,
'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (50, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (50,
'proposed-updates'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii apt 0.7.25 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libdpkg-ruby1.8 0.3.2 modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii libgettext-ruby1.8 1.93.0-1 Gettext for ruby1.8
ii libhttp-access2-ruby1.8 2.1.5.2-1 HTTP accessing library for ruby (t
ii libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8] 1.8.7.174-3 Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-4 Interface of expat for the scripti
ii ruby 4.2 An interpreter of object-oriented
apt-listbugs recommends no packages.
Versions of packages apt-listbugs suggests:
ii debianutils 3.2.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii iceweasel [www-brows 3.5.6-1 lightweight web browser based on M
ii konqueror [www-brows 4:4.3.2-1 KDE 4's advanced file manager, web
ii lynx-cur [www-browse 2.8.8dev.1-1 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup
ii opera [www-browser] 10.10.4742.gcc4.qt3 The Opera Web Browser
ii reportbug 4.9 reports bugs in the Debian distrib
-- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:32:48PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:53:08PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> > Package: apt-listbugs
> > Version: 0.1.2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > commit da6864ae240d2ea2458b1c53aca2675ed1985f04 appears to have been
> > based on assumptions current reality fails to provide:
> > "Package has a Depends on libdpkg-ruby1.8 (>= 0.3.3) which cannot be
> > satisfied on *."
> > <http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=apt-listbugs>
> >
> > And indeed, such a package version is nowhere to be seen at the moment,
> > thus rendering apt-listbugs 0.1.2 uninstallable on all architectures.
> >
> > Ryan, as you intent to adopt dpkg-ruby, I take it you wanted to release
> > a new version / have released a new version privately already, that
> > somehow didn't yet make it into the archives?
> >
>
> It's been uploaded already (at the same time as apt-listbugs). However
> since it added new binary packages, it got stuck in NEW.
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/dpkg-ruby_0.3.3.html
>
> Sorry, I should have uploaded dpkg-ruby first and waited for it to be
> ACCEPTed before uploading apt-listbugs. It slipped my mind that it
> would have to go through NEW.
>
> So now we wait for the ftp team to ACCEPT the new dpkg-ruby.
>
and it has been ACCEPTed now.
--
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanrya...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
