block 323224 by 322500
thanks

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:28:57AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:50:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:00:42PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > > Package: libstonith0
> > > Version: 1.2.3-12
> > > Severity: serious
> > 
> > >  - libstonith0 depends on libsnmp5 (>= 5.1).
> > >  - libsnmp5 in sid conflicts with libstonith0 (<= 1.2.3-12)
> > 
> > > libstonith0 should be rebuilt, and have a versioned dependency on the
> > > new libsnmp5. (libsnmp5 broke the ABI without changing the soname, thus
> > > the conflict; see #322500.)
> > 
> > Please hold off on reuploading libstonith0; the manner in which the net-snmp
> > maintainer chose to "fix" the ABI problem is not acceptable from a
> > dependency management standpoint, and will require further changes that
> > would in turn require libstonith0 to be reuploaded.

> Ok, holding off. Is there some way that I can get notification
> of when to rebuild. I have subscribed to #322500 (well tried to,
> we shall see if it works), so if more information goes there I should
> see it. Is there a better place to get this informatin?

That's the bug to track right now.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to