On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:45:42PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> So, imho, this rather sounds like a bug/misbehavior in libc to me.
> Anyway, I did not have time to dig into that further (and, thus, lost
> track of that bug :-/). Possibly, libc behaves correctly, if the "right"
> defines are used. Also, this patch does not have any real disadvantages
> from my point of view, so I'm fine with it.
Yes, it can be that "deep" the issue, but I confess that I'm more
inclined to believe the "const" should be removed. I agree that the
current fix is a good one in the meantime, though.
> Thanks again for the NMU!
You're more than welcome, and thanks for taking care of pfstools!
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
