Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:02:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298869: fixed in planner 0.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 12:41:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 04:41:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D9Mz2-000529-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:41:44 -0800
Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225])
          by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:41:14 -0500
Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id 70ADBC6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:38:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:38:49 -0500
From: Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: planner
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free

(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)

Please rebuild planner without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on 
multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload.

Thanks.


-- 
off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298869-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 04:14:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 21:14:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E4WAy-0000jE-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:02:16 -0700
From: =?utf-8?q?Martin-=C3=89ric_Racine?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#298869: fixed in planner 0.13-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:02:16 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: planner
Source-Version: 0.13-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
planner, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

planner-dev_0.13-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/planner/planner-dev_0.13-1_i386.deb
planner_0.13-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/planner/planner_0.13-1.diff.gz
planner_0.13-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/planner/planner_0.13-1.dsc
planner_0.13-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/planner/planner_0.13-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated planner package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:05:03 +0300
Source: planner
Binary: planner planner-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mikael Sennerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 planner    - project management application
 planner-dev - Planner development library
Closes: 236367 249854 298869 303476 303476 303861 304546 306900
Changes: 
 planner (0.13-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added myself to Uploaders as previously agreed with maintainer.
   * Acknowledge recent Non-Maintainer Uploads (NMU):
     - Frank Lichtenheld (Closes: #298869)
     - Jordi Mallach (Closes: #303476)
     - me (Closes: #236367, #249854, #303476, #303861, #304546, #306900)
     Thanks to everyone for their help!
   * Upgraded to Debian Policy 3.6.2 standards; no change required.
   * Merged back old changelog.Debian from mrproject package.
   * Removed no longer needed 'mrproject' dummy package.
Files: 
 c285142c212595971b8a0e34384e574a 1041 gnome optional planner_0.13-1.dsc
 080b65ef0628d758d85e387f51d7565e 3028956 gnome optional 
planner_0.13.orig.tar.gz
 fa328f72698d47221c423ef05f334e8f 56917 gnome optional planner_0.13-1.diff.gz
 88e7b4f0f05904385326953c0af54dca 2098932 gnome optional planner_0.13-1_i386.deb
 df80386267d48a86c2ae3c5029fb5104 39518 libdevel optional 
planner-dev_0.13-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkMAEh8ACgkQQKW+7XLQPLEL8gCdGFoGJ6eYtE5eHqTFcx8omrz0
HxoAn1EBXfo/6FLx3JClBvH62UQ8k9S8
=2Ewx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to